By Lina Irawan 
Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly redefining the modern workplace, moving beyond mere technological novelty to become a fundamental driver of productivity and innovation. By automating routine, repetitive tasks, AI tools are liberating employees from the mundane, enabling them to redirect their cognitive energy towards more engaging, strategic, and ultimately, value-adding projects. This shift marks the dawn of what many are calling the "AI time dividend"—a profound opportunity for organizations to unlock unprecedented levels of efficiency and growth. Yet, realizing this potential is proving to be a complex challenge, with many companies struggling to fully capitalize on the hours AI is freeing up.
The promise of this AI-driven transformation is staggering. The McKinsey Global Institute (MGI), a leading authority on economic and business trends, estimates that within the next five years, a remarkable 57% of all U.S. work hours could be automated with technologies that are already in existence today. This isn’t a futuristic prediction; it’s a present reality poised for widespread deployment. From drafting emails and generating reports to analyzing vast datasets and managing complex schedules, AI is demonstrating its capacity to perform tasks that traditionally consumed a significant portion of an employee’s day. The theoretical outcome is a massive surge in productivity, allowing human capital to be redeployed to areas demanding creativity, critical thinking, emotional intelligence, and complex problem-solving—skills that remain uniquely human.
However, the journey from theoretical potential to practical value creation is fraught with obstacles. While the "AI time dividend" is a compelling concept, cashing it in has proven surprisingly difficult for many organizations. One of the primary factors contributing to this struggle is the highly uneven adoption of AI tools across enterprises. In any given organization, a stark dichotomy often emerges: some employees enthusiastically embrace AI, leveraging generative AI assistants, automation platforms, and intelligent analytics to save double-digit hours each week, while others remain entirely untouched by these transformative tools, either due to lack of awareness, training, access, or perceived relevance. This disparity creates internal inefficiencies and prevents a systemic realization of the AI dividend.
A second, even more critical factor is that AI’s potential is not being fully realized, even where it is adopted. A recent survey of CEOs and senior executives by Gartner, a global research and advisory firm, illuminated this critical gap. While the survey found that AI saved an impressive average of 5.7 hours per employee per week, a disheartening revelation followed: only 1.7 of those hours were actually redirected to work that demonstrably improved business outcomes. The remaining four hours often dissipate into unstructured "unassigned saved time," leading to a significant loss of potential value. This gap indicates that merely saving time is insufficient; what truly matters is how that saved time is intentionally and strategically reinvested.
The root of this problem often lies in organizational inertia and rigid structures. Traditional corporate org charts, designed for a pre-AI era, simply do not have designated "boxes" for "Unassigned Saved Time" or "Ad-hoc Strategic Initiatives." Companies are adept at allocating capital, managing headcount, and defining roles within established hierarchies, but they lack frameworks for dynamically reallocating freed-up time. This structural rigidity prevents the fluid movement of human effort towards newly identified opportunities or pressing strategic projects. Without a clear mechanism for redirecting these newly available hours, they are frequently absorbed by existing, less critical tasks, or simply vanish into the ether of underutilized capacity.
Compounding this structural challenge is a significant psychological barrier among employees. A global survey conducted in 2024 involving more than 17,000 workers revealed that nearly half of them felt uncomfortable telling their manager they used AI to speed up a task. This widespread discomfort points to a fundamental lack of trust and clarity within organizations. Employees fear that increased efficiency might be met with demands for higher output, job insecurity, or even a perception of diminished personal value. If saving time is perceived as a risk rather than a reward, employees will naturally hesitate to fully leverage AI, stifling adoption and hindering the realization of its full benefits.
For executives, however, the imperative to scale up AI and unlock its value is paramount. The strategic deployment and effective management of this "AI time dividend" is rapidly becoming a defining leadership challenge of our era. To successfully navigate this transformation and convert saved hours into tangible strategic advantages, leaders must adopt a multi-faceted approach.
Develop a Blueprint for the Future.
The journey begins not with technology, but with strategy. Leaders must start by meticulously defining where technology can drive the maximum possible automation. This involves a comprehensive process mapping exercise to identify repetitive, high-volume, and time-consuming tasks across all departments. Once these automation opportunities are identified, the next critical step is to map these new organizational possibilities onto the operating domains that generate the most economic value for the business. This strategic blueprint will prioritize which areas offer the greatest returns for AI investment and organizational reconfiguration. Based on this assessment, leaders can then prioritize the "where, when, and how" to restructure the organization, considering value potential, technical feasibility, and the degree of change management required.
This transformation can be broadly categorized into two levels. In "Level 1," AI primarily augments existing work activities. This involves using AI tools to assist employees with tasks such as drafting emails, summarizing documents, accelerating data analysis, or speeding up decision-making processes. The time saved through Level 1 augmentation can significantly boost individual and team productivity, potentially by up to 20%. However, because Level 1 largely applies to existing ways of working and structures, its impact is inherently limited. It optimizes the current system but does not fundamentally redefine it.
"Level 2," in contrast, involves a complete organizational reconfiguration to take full advantage of AI. This is where the true disruptive potential lies. Existing linear and sequential workflows, typical of traditional hierarchical organizations, can be replaced by dynamic teams of parallel processing AI agents. These AI agents are managed and overseen by human employees who, instead of performing the routine tasks themselves, now have broader spans of control, focusing on strategic oversight, complex problem-solving, and managing the AI ecosystem. This radical shift in operating models enables unprecedented levels of efficiency, responsiveness, and innovation. The potential to boost overall growth and productivity in a Level 2 organization is massive, transforming how work is conceptualized and executed. Leaders face a crucial decision: where are they comfortable with the modest, incremental benefits of Level 1, and where do they possess the vision and courage to pursue the transformative power of Level 2? This strategic choice represents one of the greatest resource reallocation challenges of our time.
Clarify AI’s Role.
Trust and clarity are not merely desirable; they are critical prerequisites for deploying AI on a scale that truly matters. Without explicit permission to use AI tools, robust support to develop necessary AI-related skills, and credible reassurances that efficiency gains will not be punished with layoffs or unrealistic new demands, companies will struggle to reap the full benefits AI can bring. To foster this environment of trust, organizations must, as a starting point, be unequivocally explicit about acceptable use policies for AI, clearly define associated risks, and establish transparent metrics for measuring the quality and impact of AI-assisted work. This proactive approach removes ambiguity, which can otherwise push employees to play it safe and underutilize AI. It also provides leaders with clear insights into where to double down on tooling, data access, and enablement initiatives. Training, unfortunately, remains a hit-or-miss affair. A recent global survey by Slack highlighted this deficiency, revealing that a staggering 61% of workers had received less than five hours of AI-related training. This stark figure underscores the urgent need for comprehensive and continuous upskilling programs to ensure employees are equipped with the competencies to effectively integrate AI into their daily workflows.
Set Clear Expectations.
It is the fundamental responsibility of CEOs and managers to actively direct the time freed up by AI towards the company’s overarching strategic goals. This requires identifying and empowering "high-potential change agents" within the organization—individuals who possess the foresight and initiative to discern how different parts of the organization can best create value with AI-enabled efficiencies. While no two organizations will make identical choices, intentionality is paramount. Employees must genuinely believe that saving time is rewarded, not penalized. Transparency is therefore critical: leaders must clearly articulate how time savings translate into tangible benefits, such as higher success rates in sales or projects, opportunities for developing new skills, accelerated career advancement, and, where appropriate, enhanced compensation. By linking AI-driven efficiency directly to personal and organizational benefits, companies can cultivate a culture where employees are motivated to explore and leverage AI’s full potential.
Make Time Valuable.
Executives are accustomed to the strategic reallocation of capital and human headcount. It is now imperative that they add the time freed up by AI to this list of critical resources. These newly available hours should not be left to chance; instead, organizations must proactively create robust mechanisms to productively redeploy them. Some forward-thinking companies have already begun to implement formal time reallocation programs in conjunction with their AI rollouts, allowing employees to flexibly move their efforts to where the work is most impactful. Examples of such innovative approaches include team-level "time-savings dashboards" that provide clear visibility into where hours are being freed and how they are being reinvested. Internal "gig marketplaces" empower employees to spend their freed-up hours on cross-functional projects outside their usual roles, fostering skill development and collaboration. Furthermore, dedicated "monthly innovation days" can bring focused attention to new ideas and experimental projects, channeling collective ingenuity towards future growth.
Think Outcomes, Not Hours.
Ultimately, saving and reallocating hours is a means to an end; the true objective is better decisions, accelerated growth, and enhanced business outcomes. Incentives within the organization must therefore be aligned accordingly. Instead of merely rewarding individuals or teams for hours saved, companies should incentivize improved AI-driven business outcomes such as increased customer satisfaction, higher revenue per seller, or significant reductions in cycle times for critical processes. To further cultivate a sense of self-interest in promoting these outcomes, a portion of the time dividend should be converted into direct employee benefits. This could include bonus pools tied to AI-driven performance, opportunities for career-advancing "stretch roles" that broaden skill sets, or even the perk of fewer, more efficient meetings, allowing for greater focus on impactful work.
In addition to traditional responsibilities such as strategy, financial management, and business development, today’s leaders must evolve to become experts in time allocation. When clear expectations are set, trustworthy incentives are established, and innovative organizational structures are put in place, the next time a smart algorithm saves an hour of work, both the employee and the company will know exactly how that hour can be put to its most productive use. This critical resource cannot be left to chance: time is, after all, a terrible thing to waste.
The opinions expressed in Fortune.com commentary pieces are solely the views of their authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and beliefs of Fortune.