By Lina Irawan 
The announcement blindsided not only international observers but also virtually every informed individual and institution within Caracas, underscoring the extraordinary level of secrecy surrounding its negotiation. Such clandestine dealings, particularly concerning a nation’s most vital strategic assets, are antithetical to principles of good governance, transparency, and democratic accountability. They foster an environment ripe for corruption and undermine the very foundations of a stable, predictable economic future for Venezuela.
Beyond the immediate controversy of this surreptitious agreement, its emergence brings into sharp relief the fundamental and urgent need for establishing clear, enforceable private property rights over Venezuela’s colossal oil reserves. The absence of such rights has long been a critical impediment, preventing these vast reserves from having a positive present value, thereby denying the Venezuelan people the immense wealth they inherently represent. Understanding this paradox requires a deeper dive into the historical mismanagement and systemic decay of Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. (PDVSA), the state-owned oil company that has historically dominated the nation’s economy.
PDVSA, once a beacon of efficiency and technological prowess in the global oil industry, has devolved into a stark symbol of state-owned enterprise failure. Its dominance is undeniable, accounting for nearly 95% of Venezuela’s foreign exchange earnings at its peak. However, by almost any metric—production figures, reserve management, or operational efficiency—PDVSA is now grossly mismanaged. The company’s decline is a tragic saga of political interference, professional purges, and chronic underinvestment, leaving it a shadow of its former self.
The golden era of PDVSA is often associated with the 1994-1998 period under the leadership of Luis Giusti. During his tenure, PDVSA’s production soared, driven by meritocratic management, strategic investments, and a professional workforce. The company was renowned for its technical expertise and its ability to attract foreign capital through joint ventures, fostering a dynamic and productive environment. This trajectory, however, dramatically reversed with the ascent of Hugo Chávez to the presidency in 1999 and the subsequent introduction of "Chavismo" as the country’s guiding economic and political doctrine.
Chávez’s socialist revolution viewed PDVSA as a political tool rather than a professional enterprise. Initially, Venezuela’s oil output began to stagnate, a direct consequence of increasing political intervention and a shift in priorities from efficiency to ideological alignment. The situation exacerbated significantly after the attempted coup in April 2002. Chávez responded to the perceived disloyalty of PDVSA’s highly skilled workforce by orchestrating a mass purge of approximately 18,000 professionals—engineers, geologists, technicians, and managers—who were replaced by "reliable" hands loyal to his socialist regime, irrespective of their expertise. This catastrophic brain drain stripped PDVSA of its institutional memory and technical competence, crippling its operational capabilities for decades to come.
Following the devastating output plunge of 2002-2003, Venezuela’s production temporarily recovered, largely due to high global oil prices that masked underlying structural deficiencies and allowed for some reinvestment. However, with the passing of Chávez in March 2013 and Nicolás Maduro’s assumption of the presidency, another, more precipitous, output decline commenced. Under Maduro, the politicization of PDVSA intensified, with key leadership positions increasingly filled by military generals lacking any discernible experience in the oil industry. For instance, in 2017, President Maduro appointed a National Guard general to lead PDVSA, a decision emblematic of the regime’s disregard for professional competence. This trend has left Venezuela’s oil output drastically lower than when Chávez first took power in 1999, plunging from nearly 3.5 million barrels per day (bpd) to a mere few hundred thousand bpd, a reduction of over 80%.
The physical capital of PDVSA has been consumed at an unsustainably rapid rate. Years of chronic underinvestment mean that capital expenditures have fallen far below the value of equipment consumed annually by depreciation and amortization. This has resulted in a rapidly aging and deteriorating infrastructure across the entire oil production chain, from wells and pipelines to refineries and export terminals. Equipment breakdowns are rampant, leading to prolonged downtimes, increased accident rates, and significant environmental hazards. Simultaneously, the quality and quantity of human capital have plummeted due to the aforementioned purges, continued brain drain as skilled professionals flee the country, and a severe lack of training and development for the remaining workforce. The synergistic combination of plunging physical and human capital has left the once-mighty state-owned oil company in a state of advanced disrepair, barely able to extract and process its vast underground wealth.
Crucially, PDVSA’s decreased output is not attributable to dwindling oil reserves; Venezuela still boasts the world’s largest proven conventional oil reserves, estimated at over 300 billion barrels. Instead, the problem lies squarely in the drastically altered rate at which these reserves are being depleted. The depletion rate, a critical metric in petroleum economics, provides the key to understanding an oil company’s long-term viability and the true value of its reserves. It measures the percentage of proven reserves extracted annually.
Venezuela’s depletion rate has been falling rapidly since 2007, plummeting to an abysmal 0.124% per year at present. This figure carries profound economic implications: at this rate, it would take an astounding 558 years for PDVSA’s proven reserves to be halfway depleted. Such an extended timeframe renders the vast majority of these reserves virtually worthless in today’s dollars, a direct consequence of the principles of positive time preference and discounting. The further into the future an economic benefit is projected, the less its present value. If one must wait over half a millennium to produce and sell a barrel of oil, that barrel’s present value, when discounted at any reasonable rate, approaches zero. Thus, Venezuela’s colossal oil wealth, while physically present, is economically inert under current management.
To grasp the severity of Venezuela’s situation, consider the operational model of a major international oil company like ExxonMobil. Exxon’s depletion rate typically hovers close to 9% per year. This rate implies that it would take approximately 7.4 years for Exxon’s oil reserves to be halfway depleted, demonstrating a highly efficient and economically rational approach to resource extraction that maximizes present value and allows for continuous reinvestment and shareholder returns. The stark contrast between Exxon’s and PDVSA’s depletion rates underscores the monumental mismanagement plaguing Venezuela’s oil industry.
My perspective on these matters is informed by extensive experience in petroleum economics. Indeed, I served as a member of the United Arab Emirates’ Financial Advisory Council from 2008 to 2014. During that period, I utilized a simple yet robust model I had developed to analyze the UAE’s oil production strategy. Plugging in realistic economic parameters, I concluded that the UAE, despite its considerable reserves, was depleting them at an unsustainably slow rate. My advice to the UAE was unequivocal: "take the money and run." This strategy advocated for a dramatically accelerated depletion rate to maximize the present value of their oil wealth, diversify their economy with the proceeds, and secure a prosperous future beyond fossil fuels.
The UAE leadership recognized the wisdom of this counsel. For years, they actively sought a dramatic increase in their OPEC quota, signaling their desire for greater autonomy and higher production. When such a significant increase was consistently denied by the cartel, the UAE, in a bold move, ultimately decided to exit OPEC in May 2026, according to contemporary reports. This decision allowed the UAE to gain full control over its production policies, pursue a more aggressive depletion strategy, and unlock the true economic potential of its reserves.
Venezuela now stands at a critical juncture, facing a profound humanitarian and economic crisis exacerbated by hyperinflation that has decimated the purchasing power of its currency, the bolivar. The path to recovery, while challenging, is clear and must begin with decisive economic reforms. First, Venezuela must immediately "mothball" the bolivar, relegating it to a museum piece, and replace it entirely with the U.S. dollar. This act of dollarization would deliver a powerful positive confidence shock, instantly stabilizing the monetary system, curbing hyperinflation, and restoring a modicum of predictability essential for economic revival.
Following this crucial monetary reform, Venezuela must employ every legitimate means to privatize its oil industry. This process would involve establishing ironclad private property rights over oil assets, providing the legal certainty and security that domestic and international investors desperately require. Privatization would not only attract much-needed foreign capital and advanced technology but also bring back the professional expertise that has been systematically expunged from PDVSA. With clear property rights and private sector efficiency, Venezuela could dramatically increase its oil production, moving its depletion rate closer to industry norms and finally transforming its vast underground wealth into tangible present value for its suffering populace.
The current U.S.-Venezuela oil deal, shrouded in secrecy and potentially illegitimate, represents a dangerous distraction from the fundamental reforms Venezuela desperately needs. True recovery will not come from backroom deals but from transparent, market-oriented policies that empower its citizens, protect property rights, and unleash the true potential of its immense natural resources. The time for Venezuela to act is now.
The opinions expressed in Fortune.com commentary pieces are solely the views of their authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and beliefs of Fortune.
