By Lina Irawan 
Over the past decade, however, the Mattel-owned brand has navigated turbulent waters, signaling what many observers have dubbed a "midlife crisis." The company closed dozens of its iconic retail stores, restructured its operations, and experimented with new product lines. These shifts included introducing modernized historical dolls, such as a re-envisioned Kirsten with contemporary "space buns," alongside brand collaborations that, while commercially savvy, often felt a departure from the nuanced, historically grounded characters upon which the brand was built. This strategic pivot raised questions among long-time fans and cultural commentators about whether American Girl was losing sight of its original, educational mission.
The initial cadre of American Girl characters, meticulously crafted and deeply researched, offered a rich, accessible past to millions of American girls, simultaneously challenging them to envision and strive for a better future. These weren’t just playthings; they were companions whose lives, set against backdrops of societal change and personal struggle, were often shockingly different from their owners’, yet sometimes comfortingly familiar. Pleasant Rowland’s vision introduced girls to historical counterparts like Samantha Parkington, Molly McIntire, Kirsten Larson, Felicity Merriman, Addy Walker, Josefina Montoya, Kaya’aton’my, and Kit Kittredge. Through their eyes, young readers grappled with complex historical realities, fostering an early understanding of what it means to be American, beyond simplistic national myths. In stark contrast, the brand’s current focus often appears to lean more heavily on evoking nostalgia for its early years among adult consumers rather than consistently delivering fresh, engaging, and deeply historical stories for the next generation.
For millions of American girls, these dolls and their accompanying books, depicting 9- and 10-year-old protagonists, became an integral part of daily life. They served as relatable entry points into challenging historical topics. The narratives underscored an imperfect America, presenting nuanced realities that were ahead of their time in children’s media. Addy Walker, for instance, a courageous young girl escaping slavery during the Civil War, not only navigates the perilous journey to freedom but subsequently confronts the complex, often disheartening hierarchy of color and lingering prejudice even in the Union-controlled North. Samantha Parkington, an affluent orphan in the turn-of-the-20th-century Gilded Age, grapples with personal grief while simultaneously witnessing the harsh realities of child labor and vast social inequalities that defined her era. Kirsten Larson, a Swedish immigrant pioneering on the American frontier in the 1850s, struggles with language barriers and cultural assimilation, even as her story subtly touches upon the often-fraught relationship between white settlers and Native American communities.
These original American Girls were not idealized figures. They made mistakes, faced profound challenges, and learned vital lessons while living in societies that were undeniably unfair, unequal, and unjust—societies that were clearly in need of change. Their stories, while age-appropriate, did not shy away from the darker aspects of American history, instead using these struggles as catalysts for character development and moral reflection. This pedagogical approach aimed to teach children about and from the past, fostering empathy and a critical understanding of historical progress.
This nuanced approach stands in stark contrast to the polarized historical narratives prevalent in contemporary adult discourse. Today, it often seems that adults are pressured to accept only two extreme interpretations of American history: either the U.S. is presented as an unquestionably wonderful, divinely ordained nation, or it is depicted as foundationally flawed and irredeemably oppressive. This binary thinking leaves little room for the complexity that defines any nation’s past. President Donald Trump’s 2025 executive order, "Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History," exemplifies this reductive view. The order argued against what it perceived as modern histories that "reconstruct an unparalleled legacy of advancing liberty, individual rights, and human happiness… as inherently racist, sexist, oppressive, or otherwise irredeemably flawed." Such pronouncements effectively deny the possibility for America’s history to be simultaneously a story of advancing rights and a reality marked by racism, sexism, and oppression—a paradox that is, in fact, central to the nation’s ongoing struggle for its ideals.
American Girl, from its inception, consistently offered a far more sophisticated and nuanced telling of history. Through the eyes of fictional Felicity Merriman, introduced in 1991 and set in colonial Williamsburg on the eve of the American Revolution, young girls learned that the birth of the United States was not a simple, heroic tale of unified patriots. Instead, they discovered it was an ideological and multidimensional conflict, essentially a brutal civil war that tore apart families, pitted neighbors against each other, and destroyed communities. The books portrayed Loyalists not as cartoon villains, but as people with their own deeply held beliefs, adding layers of complexity to a period often oversimplified in elementary education.
In a particularly poignant scene from 1774, Felicity’s father, a staunch patriot, tells his apprentice Ben, "War is the worst way to solve disagreements. War is like a terrible illness. Everyone suffers. People die. Those who survive are weakened, and ’tis a long while before they are full strength again." This dialogue, delivered in a children’s book, offered a profound and sobering perspective on the human cost of conflict, even one fought for liberty. Felicity and her father ultimately support the new nation, but they do so with a clear-eyed understanding that it is an imperfect solution to deeply complex problems. This commitment to portraying history as inherently imperfect, yet offering avenues for progress, was a hallmark of the original American Girl brand, inviting girls not just to learn about the nation, but to actively envision and contribute to making it better.
Rowland’s vision, while grounded in historical accuracy, also contained an element of impossible optimism. The narratives, designed for children, often wrapped up with resolutions that, while satisfying, sometimes glossed over the enduring nature of historical challenges. Addy flees slavery, learns to read, and navigates northern racism all within the span of a single year—a narrative arc that, while inspiring, compresses decades of struggle into a neat package. Upper-class Samantha, through her friendship with poor Irish immigrant Nelly O’Malley, successfully changes her snobby grandmother’s prejudiced opinions on immigration—an admirable outcome, but one that perhaps oversimplifies the entrenched social biases of the era. Indeed, all of the company’s historical stories ultimately conclude with a sense of hope and happy resolution, a necessary element for children’s literature but one that might limit the scope for deeper historical inquiry.
Many American women, having grown up with these stories, have carried their affection for American Girl into adulthood. This enduring connection presents a unique opportunity for Mattel to expand its storytelling, perhaps by crafting more complicated narratives that resonate with an adult audience deeply invested in the brand’s legacy. As one popular meme humorously but pointedly suggested, "We need an American Girl who survived the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire"—a reference to the tragic 1911 industrial disaster that highlighted brutal labor conditions. This sentiment underscores a desire for stories that delve into the grittier, more challenging aspects of American history that were perhaps too intense for the original child-focused books.
If America’s women have so wholeheartedly embraced the world American Girl built, could the brand expand its universe to include an American Girl who lived in a Japanese internment camp during World War II, exploring themes of civil liberties, prejudice, and resilience? Or perhaps one whose family came to the country fleeing violence, tackling contemporary issues of immigration and displacement through a historical lens? Such narratives would undoubtedly push the boundaries of the brand’s traditional storytelling but could also deepen its relevance and impact for a generation of adult fans seeking more than just nostalgia.
In one recent instance, Mattel did attempt a more contemporary, albeit perhaps still sanitized, historical narrative. The 2026 Girl of the Year, Raquel Reyes, is introduced as a Mexican American resident of Kansas City, Missouri, and, notably, the great-great-granddaughter of Samantha Parkington, one of the original American Girls. While this cross-generational connection offers intriguing possibilities, the narrative largely presents Raquel’s family as seamlessly blending Mexican and Mid-Atlantic heritages with seemingly little challenge. There is no explicit attempt to discuss how Samantha’s Grandmary, a product of her time with her own class and ethnic prejudices, might have reacted to or navigated this modern, multicultural world and family. This approach, while celebrating diversity, primarily delivers a comforting sense of continuity and nostalgia, rather than engaging in a robust historical argument about the evolving nature of American identity and the persistent challenges of prejudice and assimilation.
Adult consumers are, in fact, stabilizing the brand, which has reported profits over the past five quarters after enduring several years of significant losses. This financial recovery is largely driven by a demographic eager to reconnect with their childhood memories. However, the products American Girl is offering, and women are buying, often lean towards merchandise imbued with nostalgia—such as Molly-plaid tumblers or retro-themed clothing for the dolls—more than they do new, layered historical narratives. In an era increasingly defined by political polarization and alarmingly oversimplified historical narratives, American women, many of whom were raised on the rich, complex stories of the original American Girls, need not just nostalgia. They need a new fleet of American Girls who can courageously tell the difficult, dangerous, heartbreaking, and ultimately tenacious stories of lives past, reflecting the full spectrum of the American experience.
The enduring appeal and critical engagement with American Girl’s foundational stories demonstrate a profound truth: Americans can indeed handle complex histories. More profoundly, American girls were raised on them, proving that children, given the right tools and narratives, are capable of grappling with nuance, injustice, and the messy realities of the past. The legacy of American Girl offers a powerful blueprint for engaging with history in a way that fosters understanding, empathy, and a commitment to a better future—a mission more vital than ever in today’s fractured world.
Tara Strauch is the Paul L. Cantrell Associate Professor of History at Centre College, where she teaches early American history from the colonial period to the Civil War. Her courses include American holidays and American Girl, reflecting her academic engagement with historical narratives in popular culture and education.
The opinions expressed in Fortune.com commentary pieces are solely the views of their authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and beliefs of Fortune.
